In the world of Linux system administration, the ps command is something you run every day without thinking about danger. But sometimes even the most familiar tools can bring surprising risks. One of those cases is CVE-2023-4016, a recently discovered vulnerability in the ps utility that can let ordinary users write nearly endless unfiltered data into a running process’s heap.
In this article, we’ll break down how this works, who’s at risk, and how someone might exploit it with simple examples and references to help you dive deeper.
What’s the Issue With CVE-2023-4016?
At its core, CVE-2023-4016 is a privilege escalation and denial-of-service vulnerability. This might sound technical, but here’s what that means:
The ps tool reads process data from the system and formats it for display.
- Under certain circumstances, a user who can run ps might trigger the binary to allocate unbounded data.
- This is possible because of how certain user-controlled fields are read and copied directly into the heap memory, with little or no filtering.
Put simply: If you are allowed to run ps on a vulnerable machine, you might be able to dump gigabytes of garbage data into memory, making the system unstable or possibly interfering with the process itself.
What Versions and Platforms Are Affected?
This flaw has mostly been reported in distributions using the procps-ng implementation of ps, which is found on most Linux distributions, including Debian, Ubuntu, and Fedora.
Reference:
- Debian Security CVE-2023-4016 Notice
Exploit Details: How Could This Work?
Imagine you’re a normal user on a multi-user Linux system. You have access to create files, run commands, and execute ps. On most Linux systems, ps reads information about processes from files in the /proc directory (like /proc/<pid>/cmdline). If you’re able to control or influence what appears in those files—say, by running a process with a specially crafted command line—you can affect what ps reads and, eventually, writes onto its own heap.
Run the Vulnerable ps:
When ps parses the process table, it reads those fields directly, allocating memory for them—no size checks or filters.
Heap memory is filled with massive, unsolicited data.
- On a system with memory limits, this could crash ps or even sway the system into an out-of-memory (OOM) state.
- If ps were ever invoked with elevated permissions (like setuid—never recommended!), the implications could be worse.
Here’s a practical demonstration
# Create a massive command line for a process
perl -e 'exec "sleep", "9999", "A" x 50000000'
# In another terminal, run ps to display all process args
ps auxww
This will cause ps to read a command line argument that’s 50 million "A" characters long. If your system's ps does not have proper limits, it will try to allocate enough heap memory to represent this—and likely crash, or at least slow down the system.
Warning: Don’t do this on a production system! It can make your box unresponsive.
Below is the simplified logic that causes the issue (in C-like pseudocode)
// ps reads from /proc/<pid>/cmdline
FILE *f = fopen("/proc/<pid>/cmdline", "r");
char *cmdline = malloc(READ_SIZE);
size_t total = fread(cmdline, 1, READ_SIZE, f);
// No check on total size or filtering!
If the READ_SIZE is not capped, or comes from user-controlled metadata, an attacker can make ps read and allocate large amounts of memory.
Denial of Service: Any user can fill up memory and slow or crash running systems with ease.
- Chaining With Other Bugs: In some configurations, if combined with other vulnerabilities, this could theoretically lead to code execution or privilege escalation.
- Shared Machines at More Risk: On shared hosting or university systems, a single unprivileged user could affect everyone.
Example Debian fix:
Debian DSA-5469-1: procps security update
- Limit Command Line Lengths: Use shell configurations or limits to restrict ridiculously-long arguments.
References
- CVE-2023-4016 on MITRE
- NIST NVD Entry
- Upstream Fix Discussion
Final Notes
The idea that a simple diagnostic tool like ps could become a tool for attacking your system is a wake-up call for anyone who manages Linux boxes. Keep your system packages up to date and be mindful of how much information tools trust from untrusted sources—especially user input.
If you want more technical details or help patching, check out the links above or drop your question in the comments below!
Timeline
Published on: 08/02/2023 05:15:00 UTC
Last modified on: 08/21/2023 03:15:00 UTC